When it comes to suppressors, nothing matters more than real shooting experience. Specs and renderings can only say so much — what counts is how a suppressor performs when rounds are actually going downrange.
In a recent video review, an independent creator spent time testing one of the rare Tuna Can V1 suppressor prototypes, sharing hands-on impressions, sound comparisons, and honest feedback from live-fire testing. With only 25 V1 units ever produced, this video offers a rare look at an early-stage suppressor and where it’s headed next.
A Rare Prototype: Tuna Can V1
The suppressor featured in the video is Tuna Can V1, an early prototype designed to validate core concepts before full production.
Key context:
- Only 25 V1 units were manufactured
- Designed as a modular suppressor
- Built as a test platform to gather feedback and refine future versions
- Not a finalized commercial product
From the start, the reviewer makes it clear that this is version one — and that improvements are already planned for V2, including redesigned internal geometry aimed at even better sound reduction.
Modular Design and What’s Coming in V2
The V1 uses a modular baffling system, allowing the suppressor to be disassembled and reconfigured. This approach provides flexibility, but the reviewer also discusses an important tradeoff:
modular suppressors versus dedicated designs.
While modularity offers versatility, the video notes that dedicated suppressor designs often achieve the quietest results. That insight directly informs planned improvements for the upcoming V2, which is expected to feature:
- Increased spacing between baffles
- A more dedicated 9mm configuration
- Improved internal chambers for reduced sound signature
This kind of iterative design process is exactly why early testing matters.
Live Fire Testing and Ammunition Comparison
The reviewer conducted sound testing using 9mm ammunition, comparing:
- 115-grain
- 147-grain
Testing was done with the suppressor fully assembled and paired with a proprietary mounting system. One of the most valuable aspects of the video is the side-by-side ammo comparison, demonstrating how ammunition choice directly impacts perceived sound.
As expected, 147-grain ammo produced noticeably quieter results — a takeaway especially useful for shooters new to suppressed firearms.
Testing Without Hearing Protection
In a move that adds real credibility, the reviewer performed portions of the testing without ear protection. This is rare in many suppressor reviews and offers a more authentic perspective on real-world sound levels.
The conclusion from those tests:
- The Tuna Can V1 sounded quieter than many other suppressors the reviewer has personally tested
- The combination of suppressor design and mounting system played a significant role in that performance
This reinforces an often-overlooked point: mounting systems matter just as much as the suppressor itself.
Mounting Systems Make a Difference
Throughout the video, the presenter emphasizes how critical a secure and well-designed mounting solution is to suppressor performance.
A notable quote from the video sums this up well:
“I think my stuff is a little more secure than the others and it has a little more help within the can to keep it a little more quieter.”
Stability, alignment, and consistency all contribute to effective sound suppression — and it’s something we continue to account for as we refine future designs.
Designed to Be Affordable and Approachable
Beyond sound performance, the video also touches on something just as important: accessibility.
The reviewer highlights that:
- The suppressor is designed to be affordable
- The acquisition process was less intimidating than expected
- Even first-time suppressor buyers can navigate the paperwork with the right guidance
He also notes the reality of additional costs — such as the tax stamp and transfer fees — which are often overlooked in discussions about suppressor pricing. Transparency around those costs is something we believe is essential.
Open Feedback and Continuous Improvement
One of the strongest themes throughout the video is communication.
The reviewer specifically mentions appreciating how Tuna Cans:
- Welcomes constructive criticism
- Actively gathers feedback from testers
- Uses real-world input to guide design changes
That feedback loop is what drives the transition from V1 to V2 — and ultimately to a better final product.
Final Thoughts
This video offers a valuable look at what the Tuna Can V1 prototype is today and where it’s headed tomorrow.
Key takeaways:
- Real-world testing shows strong sound performance for a prototype
- Ammo choice and mounting systems play a major role in suppression
- Modular designs offer flexibility, but dedicated designs may be quieter
- V2 is already in development with meaningful improvements planned
- Affordability and accessibility remain core priorities
We appreciate creators who take the time to test prototypes honestly and share their experiences with the community. That kind of feedback helps us build better suppressors — and helps shooters make more informed decisions.
If you’re interested in where Tuna Cans USA is headed next, keep an eye out for updates on Tuna Can V2 and future releases.